Wednesday, June 27, 2012


Open letter to District One for a grass roots council election

Friends, 

I have been talking with people in the community and have spoken with most of my fellow candidates for Oakland City Council District One and have found broad support for a grass roots campaign close to the people.  So I am writing this letter with three sets of suggestions on how to make that happen.

First the community needs to step forward and take the lead.  All of the grass roots groups can invite candidates to their regular meetings, hold mixers and/or forums, interview candidates etc.  By grass roots groups I mean everyone from the Friends of the Tool Library to Business Improvement Districts including the NCPC’s, PANIL, STAND, OCO and all the other friends of other libraries, and local groups.  This would be a good time for a local union or chamber of commerce to host an event and get their questions asked to the candidates too. 

Second, we need to make it easy and inexpensive to do.  Here are some things I saw two years ago that I think could help:
·         Just hold a mixer, pot luck food, minimal time for the candidates to introduce themselves and maximum time to meet and talk one on one. 
·         Only meet with a couple candidates at a time, easier to schedule, less of a production.
·         Hold a couple of small panels on the themes of interest to your group members instead of one big panel that crams too much in. 
Record your meetings with candidates and post them to Ustream for your members who could not make the meeting. 
·         Let the candidates speak.  Answering questions is fine, but at some point letting the candidates define what they (we) think is important. 
·         Invite a candidate or two to your regular meetings to be part of the agenda but only part of the agenda.  The candidates should commit to being there for your whole meeting and seeing what your groups regular business is.  Between now and November there is time to get to all of the candidates running to at least one meeting with some calm.
·         INVITE PRESS THAT MIGHT REALLY COME AND REPORT, that means people like http://oaklandlocal.com/ http://oaklandnorth.net/ and viewpoint@eddrick.net and our local neighborhood print. 

Third, all of us candidates need to make ourselves available.  Speaking with those fellow candidates I found at the Oakland Builders Alliance, I felt that all the candidates would like to have these close, grass roots meetings.  It is obvious that the grass roots groups will need to do the organizing and inviting.  The candidates need to make it clear when they will be available.  (for myself, see below)  I have copied all of them on this open letter.  

 
Available for public events starting July 13th
all Wednesdays and Thursdays afternoon or evenings.
Friday-Saturday-Sunday by Fridays 7/13, 7/27, 8/10, 8/24, 9/7, 9/21, 10/5, 10/19 and 11/2.

Friday, June 22, 2012

5 quick questions about the Oakland Army Base project

Question one: if we do not have funds for pensions, police, libraries, parks and adult education, how is it we have a billion dollars for speculative real estate?

Question two: if this is such a good deal, then why does the private sector not provide the investment loans?

Question three: who will the clients for these warehouse center services be? Do we have any contracts lined up in any way?

Question four: is all the money at risk public funds? Has any private company invested in this schema?

Question five: given the city's exposure, why has it.been so hard to monopolize hiring?

http://www.insidebayarea.com/ci_20892753/oakland-army-base-vote-scheduled-tuesday-night?refresh=no

Thursday, May 24, 2012

Oakland businesses need a strong and stable city government.


Oakland businesses need a strong and stable city government.
The dialog between city government and the business community should lead to longer term planning.  The overall general framework of ordnances that define the local business environment needs to be workable and not change much or often.  Renters and home owners, investors, business operators, and city administrators need a predictable environment to make their own plans and thrive. The City Council members who will be good partners for the business community will drive a hard bargain, look at the general picture, practice active oversight and be the trusted representatives of the community. 
The instability must stop. We need to get our city budget out of the current hand-to-mouth, crisis-to-crisis mode.  We cannot be starting programs or hiring police, to stop them when balancing the budget and start them again after passing a ballot measure.  This instability hurts everyone.  
Our budget should take the business cycle into account. 
We need to tax when the economy is high and spend when it is low and have a plan for both. 
We need to tax fairly and more.  The Port of Oakland should contribute more to the operations of its local government.  Some others have also been over-favored by the tax structure while some have been hurt.  New building owners are burdened with the way property taxes punish the most recent investments (Prop. 13).  The city can restructure the way it raises business, property, sales and parcel taxes to compensate.  We need more revenue, but we need to collect it in a way that keeps local employment viable, helping people buy, rent (or rent out) real estate and invest in local business. 
We need clear zoning and permitting rules.  If an activity is allowed by the zoning of a building, then the permit should be simple.  We should also put a stop to constant zoning changes and the, current micro-detailed planning and zoning maps. The current process is unpredictable and expensive.   
The system has to become navigable.  We need to turn the city permitting process around so that the applicant has a case manager.  The case manager would navigate the system, know the full process and have the authority of a manger when they do it. 
We need to take care of what is working. We should reject all planning and projects that damage current employment in favor of development projects without contracted clients. We should never tear down one business in hopes of another.  We have a high vacancy rate and the city should be working hard to see those buildings go back into use.  Our planning should always support our significant service, non-profit and government sector.  All the jobs we have should be supported, valued and retained. 
The best thing that the City of Oakland can do for its business community is to improve the quality of our schools and reduce our chronic crime rate.  The current situation lowers our quality of life and takes down real estate values with it.  The city government needs to make the problems of crime, parolee recidivism, high school truancy, homelessness, substance abuse, unemployment, housing, urban pollution and asthma our top priorities.  These problems are deep rooted and common to urban centers across our country. Turning our crime and school problems around requires the full support of every aspect of all forms of local government.  Development projects, no matter how interesting, have to take a back seat if they are not helping the city deal with at least one of these issues in a significant way. 
Don Macleay,
Candidate for Oakland City Council, District One, November 2012

Thursday, May 3, 2012

It is time for Measure Y to go.

If we are going to get any serious community policing and divert our young offenders into any kind of restorative justice programs, we need to stop wasting our time with our community-policing-through-regressive-parcel-tax Measure Y.  http://www.measurey.org/

We can also do without Measure B that we had to pass later to keep from losing the whole thing because the city did not meet the police staffing levels it promised.  

I am sure that some will be happy to hold up a laundry list of numbers lauding the accomplishments of Measure Y.  Unfortunately, Measure Y and the Measure Y way of doing things do not measure up. 

The reason that the Measure Y boosters and folk from “the inner” circle of influence hold up a laundry list of numbers lauding the accomplishments under Measure Y is because if you did not hear it from them, you would never know.  This is a crime in and of itself.  Much has been done and the ground work for many a good effort has been laid.  Why then do we always seem to be just at the beginning of our effort?  

Groundwork should have led to some serious building and results by this time.  But there is little happening at a size that is being felt on the street.  Many do not know what Measure Y is, others have not even heard of it.  In the course of talking to residents and asking for their vote, I have only heard a few positive reports on Measure Y programs.  Most tell me that they only have a vague idea of what it is about and have not seen any effects.  The rate of robberies, shootings and truancy bear this out. The numbers of our young people entering the criminal justice system year after year is hardly changed. 

This is after how many years?  How can we call it a success?  

The measures that matter tell the same old sad story.  We still have our revolving door, vicious circle of mercilessness around the courts, prison and parole system.  Measure Y in a year does not help as many people who fall into this trap in a week.  We still have large numbers of people who will not cooperate with the police, even in the case of the murder of their own family members.  According to Oakland Police Capitan Anthony Toribio in 2010 about half the families of murder victims would not cooperate with the police investigation.  

And this Spring, like all Oakland Springs, fully half of the youth who should be getting their High School Diploma will not.  That is a measure of failure on our part and a measure of trouble yet to come. 

The jobs of working with our neighborhoods and the jobs of organizing our neighborhoods are always the ones that get the ax first.  If there is a budget problem, they cut the community police officers, if there is a protest against Wall Street, they cut back on community services, and it seems like some in our police force are looking for ANY excuse not to do community policing.  They seem to find that excuse quickly and our political leadership seems to get them back on track slowly.  

One of the biggest problems with the Measure Y way of doing things is that we have no stability.  We lost a lot of ground when we cut the police staff, we lost it again at the last budget, we lost it at Occupy and we continue to see community police officer assignments and community organizing stop, restart and change personnel every semester.  Every time we start and then stop and then restart a program, we have to start a lot of the work as if it were new.  That adds up to lost money, lost trained people and worst of all, lost public willingness to get involved.  

What program can be effective with that kind of instability? 

We spend more time and attention managing Measure Y than we spend on organizing community policing.  We have nobody assigned to implementing restorative justice.  What we do have is a great big pool of money and some requests for proposals that brings the unwanted attention of opportunists and instant self-appointed experts with homemade programs.  Some are good, some are amateurish.  We need to address root causes of our social problems that cause high crime, not hold procurement fairs for a bunch of small outside projects that do not give us the numbers and quality we need.  

I also want Measure Y to go because so much of it is not about Community Policing.   

It is about the Fire Department, it is about school discipline, it is about police staffing levels (thus Measure B) and it is all about all the little political deals that made the “successful politics” needed to get it passed.  This house of cards is unstable and it has fallen more than it has done good work.  People voted for a lot that had nothing to do with community policing when then voted for Measure Y.  

The “smart politics” keeps us from having a smart policy on crime and a smart policy on budgeting.
Community policing and restorative justice is our city policy; we need to enforce it in management.
The job of community organizing should be part of how we do business in our city.  It should be led by civilians and it needs to be intentionally reaching out to whole neighborhoods across race and income differences.  We should really be thinking of how to get our grass roots neighborhoods empowered.  They need to have resources to distribute. We need to engage the difficult social changes we will need to stop the cycle of chronic crime.  If we are going to organize the neighborhoods better than the current (unelected) Neighborhood Crime Prevention Council model then we need to stop telling neighborhoods what to do and let our communities act on their/our own telling us what they need.  Otherwise we will only continue to have token grass roots democracy without many backers or any effective power.  

The job of restorative justice needs to be a real job.  To start with we should review every case BEFORE we hand it to the DA’s office for prosecution.  We have the power, through our police enforcement, not to press charges and we should use it.  EVERY time we arrest someone in Oakland we should review the situation and see if we can deal with them locally.  

Restorative justice is about a lot of things, but first and foremost it is about restoring the damage done.  

SUCCESS=  A local offender on a path to reform and making amends to their victims staying in the community and in school.

FAILURE= Every young person we needlessly send to jail where they get no rehabilitation services and only learn to become more criminal than before and to then be released to a parole system that offers them nothing and cannot keep track of them.  

That FAILURE is the system we have now.  Measure Y notwithstanding.

There is no shortcut to common sense and a common cause on crime.  Measure Y is a gimmick and it has failed because it is a gimmick.  There seems to be quite a bit of consensus about changing how we fight crime and the causes of crime and how we deal with a person caught up in crime.  Otherwise we would not have voted for Measure Y.  Most of us want what Measure Y was SUPPOSED to do. 

We need to make community policing, restorative justice and community organizing part of how we do business as a whole.  Any real improvement will be a difficult process of social change.  We have started this process and made a lot of progress.  We now need to make that progress in the quantity and quality needed to reach the whole of our community. 

Monday, April 9, 2012

Send cash so a woman can get her children back


 Send cash so a woman can get her children back

Friday my friend had her children taken away because she attended a picnic in Mosswood Park in support of the Occupy movement here in Oakland, California. 

I read the “emergency protective order” myself, minus the actual declaration which they did not include, and she is not allowed to see her children and will not even get a day in court until April 23rd.  

There was no warning, no proper filing of papers, nothing.  Her ex just filed like a thief in the dark and snuck the kids out of the school.  She arrived to find them gone.  The school had seen the restraining order, but she had not, nobody was there to serve her or explain anything.  The only cause written on the paper was that she had attended this event at Mosswood Park, which was a picnic in a nice family park with a playground near my house.  We take my kid and her kids to this park all the time. 

First things first, she has no money and she now needs money to hire an experience family law specialist. So send her some cash to “KC”. C/O Don Macleay, P.O. Box 20299, Oakland CA, 94620.  I will give her the letters unopened.  If each of us gives a small amount, we can get her legal fees quickly. If you can give a larger amount, please do so. If you need more information to donate you can contact me.  

I know a lot about this case and I know the children.  It is for them that I am not naming names. They have been having a hard enough time as it is.  Being snatched away from their mom is probably the most hurtful thing anyone could have done to them. She has been their principle caregiver all their lives and they are too old not to be deeply hurt by what their father has just done to them.

My father was a court officer.  When my own divorce nightmare was unfolding he told me that “the system is vulnerable to those willing to perjure themselves” My father was an honorable man who would never perjure himself and I do not think he understood that many do not have those ethics. 

Translation?  Alameda Family Court is a liar's paradise.  Every document you sign says “under penalty of perjury” on it.  I have yet to hear of one case, or an instance in a case, where that was enforced.

In this case, we have a person who has no qualms telling lies in court or anywhere else.  I first met him as somebody else’s boyfriend BEFORE the younger of these two children was fathered. Since I have watched this case I have seen him run the kind of marijuana grow that gives medical grows a bad name.  He has told every kind of contradictory story in court and he has tried to attack this woman by distorting her medical history and her sexuality.  I also know his other two ex’s and their children.  One is trying to get him to pay his support and the other has recently stopped doing their custody exchange in the police stations. 

Not only does lying work well in Alameda Family Court, so does slander and smear campaigns. This is now the third time he is slandering this woman to take the kids for himself and this time he is using her politics.

Let us be very clear about something.  The kids were not ever in any danger at the picnic at Mosswood Park or at any other Occupy support action.  Despite how it is getting spun in the press, most of Occupy Oakland was more like a street fair than a protest movement.  For a while there was a Children’s Village with a play tent.  The children were separated from any confrontations in both space and time.  

Our family courts and family services are a disgrace.  Just speaking for myself and not about this case, I have no faith in the system.  It urgently needs an outside audit of the judgments, the mediation, Child Protective Services and the outside contractors who are the “evaluators” and “counseling services”. 

For this reason alone we should be helping my friend out.  No woman should become the victim of an abusive husband who can game the system to abuse her again in Family Court. 

In this case he is using her politics against her to take her children away.  If you do not feel personally threatened by that, then I would suggest that there is something you did not understand.



Thursday, February 23, 2012

Commitments for progressive candidates


Commitments for progressive candidates
running for office on a progressive platform

Winning elections is important and much good can come of it.  More good will come of it if we keep our values and ethics once in office.  Cesar Chavez refused any outside help to form his farm worker’s union.  We should learn from that union’s history that if the community is to have progressive representation, it is best to develop it from within and have the deep support and trust of the people.  Our ethics and values are as important as our political ideas, if not more.  

Commitment to social solidarity
We advocate universal education, health care, employment, housing etc from a deep sense of community and an understanding that all of us has a responsibility for the health of the community.  We advocate economic justice. 

Commitment to movement solidarity
We see ourselves as part of the larger progressive movement.  We honor, respect and nourish all the other honest efforts that are being made.  We see our campaigns as a way to advocate community solutions to community problems.  We see our own election as part of widening the scope and strengthening the whole of this movement.  

Commitment to having the support of the people
As movement builders, the support of the public is the core of our strength.  Together with the people we find empowerment through shared experiences.  Public support is the only basis for an honest mandate of an elected official.  

Commitment to community service
Running for office, and holding office if elected, is part of an overall personal dedication to be a positive contributor to the community.  We should honor the opportunity to do public service by fully serving to all of the constituents and treating offices held as a public trust.  We commit to doing all jobs honestly, openly, for all of the members of the represented community and above all with care and professionalism.  We are committed to a high quality of governance.  

Commitment to keeping our freedom of action
We keep ourselves free to act on our values and beliefs.  We will be free to act on behalf of the office we hold and the people and government we represent. When there are differences dealing with other levels of government, we should be free to advocate change and reform in how all of us are being treated.  

Commitment to democracy
We believe in having all the voices heard and all the people’s views represented fairly.  We believe in grass roots democracy.  We want a city government close to the people and far from big money politics.  

Commitment to peace
We maintain ourselves as advocates of peace, and as opponents of our current wars.  

Commitment to fighting repression
We stand against police violence.  We stand against any acts to intimidate people from exercising their right to free speech, to protest, to go on strike or any other action of the public to advocate for their rights.  We stand up against all forms of discrimination, be it racial, sexual, sexual orientation, linguistic, religious or any other. 

Commitment to fight corruption
We are opposed to the legal corruption that surrounds our electoral process and do not participate in it.  We will not accept big money, will not leverage influential people or accept the monopoly of the media gate keepers.  We will keep ourselves free of conflict of interest involving any person or business, including non-profit, that accepts government money.  We are not part of money politics and will fight for transparency and public trust. 

Friday, February 10, 2012

The Kaiser Convention Center should be occupied.


How many cities have a boarded up convention center? 

I know a lot of cities in the USA are just like Oakland and have boarded up businesses, boarded up homes and abandoned properties in them. The new American Gothic includes the homeless encampment in the freeway landscaping and the mentally ill on the sidewalks.  But a whole convention center?  

How do we categorize this problem?  

Mismanagement and neglect would be a good category.  That would lump the convention center in with the rotting Victorian mansions, concessions stands and bathrooms in our parks.  Has anyone from the public seen the inside recently?  Is it OK?  It may not be given the way the old gymnasium in North Oakland was allowed to rot with roof leakage so badly that a million dollar wooden floor is now worthless.  I am very serious, when was the last time that building was inspected or open to a press visit?  This building belongs to us, our city is known for neglect.  IS IT OK?  

Under and miss utilization would be another good category.  Back when the Kaiser Center was ostensibly open it was never really getting the attention and bookings it needed.  This is from the same city government that ropes off downtown and builds fences so that it can charge the public for its Art and Soul Festival but cannot find any events for a major convention center on a lake with a Museum, Junior College and a BART station for direct neighbors.  What I was told by those “in the know” at the time of the closure was that we were going to focus on the Fox Theater.  Is that development?  Build one multimillion dollar facility while we throw another away?  

Fiscal fiasco should also be considered as a category.  Who owns the Kaiser Convention Center now?  Who could sell it?  Who could rent it out?  During the circus that passed for a budget debate 6 months ago we “sold” the building from the City to “Redevelopment”.  The building was used as collateral for some loans that got “transferred to the City Hall building”.  That would mean if we did not pay the debts, we would have to sell City Hall to pay it!  Of course that NEVER happens, but jeez.  A lot of things that “never happen” have been happening in state, county and city budgeting recently.   Did they really go through with that plan or was it just still a plan when the State of California shut down the redevelopment agencies?  If they did, who owns the building now?  There is supposed to be a “successor agency” if I understand it right.  Who is that?

Selling a major asset to pay day-to-day bills is not a secure budget plan.  In fact it is about the worst budget plan.  Things like this make me want to raise the bar on the Council selling off public property.  It just should not be so easy to do.  

So now we have a multimillion dollar, historical convention center boarded up in the middle of our city.  The Occupy protestors who wanted to “Occupy” it would have in effect opened it back up.  We all missed a golden opportunity in a cloud of stubbornness and teargas.  All that Occupy energy could help our city at the Kaiser Convention Center. 

The public should insist that the building be put back into use.  If civic groups can turn it into some kind of civic center and pay the utilities, then the city should allow them to do it.  Right now it is just a scandal.  

One of the things that the occupy encampment showed was how much energy was available for this kind of civic center activity.  That little encampment was feeding and housing homeless people.  They had a free health clinic.  There was a series of art programs.  There was a children’s village.  There were library groups, free school, theater etc.  And the list goes on and on from a media center to community gardens.  

Our convention center is a vacant property.  It needs an occupant and we have a volunteer.