What would a better budget look like?
In truth, I do not know because a better budget will be the
result of political compromise.
The first thing we need for a better budget in Oakland is
some chance of stability.
To get that stability, we need serious, stable public support.
We need more than a squeak-by majority behind it.
·
4 unpopular members of council and a deal with
the mayor is not public support for a budget.
·
A budget report that does not show the full amount
of all the public debts and pension obligations, does not develop public
trust.
·
Manipulating the public and threatening to close
14 of 18 libraries and having our council meet in two closed door groups of
four is not a budget process that we should be proud of.
·
Dropping 80 police officers to get a compromise
on pensions is not good relations with our public employees.
This list could go on and on citing examples from almost all
of the public departments and all kinds of disappointment with our elected
official. I’ll stop here with a
question: Do you think the public at
large trusts the way our public officials are managing our public finances?
All of these events are very hard on our public employees,
many of whom have their jobs threatened every two years or less and word day to
day in an atmosphere of hand to mouth, crisis to crisis thinking on the part of
a management who gets little more than two years of planning offered to
them.
Jane Brunner, who is leaving the job that I want, (Council
Member District 1) told the Piedmont Avenue Neighborhood Improvement League
that this last budget was really a great step forward. She felt that for the first time they were
getting some kind of real information and numbers from city staff. Jane has held this seat for 16 years or
something like that. I feel that if she
feels that we have had too little information for the past fourteen years on
our budget, then the budget process is more flawed than it looks and it looks
bad.
What I see as a process leading to a better budget would be
public approval, by a wide majority, of that new budget process in a
referendum. I would submit any reformed
budget to the people for a vote. Maybe
what we need is some kind of budget convention, sort of like a charter convention
or constitutional convention and then require that it pass with the same
majority needed to authorize taxes. If
we are going to transform prior tax measures, we will need that majority to be
legal.
So given that, here are some ideas I would like to see
discussed and addressed in a total budget review.
To start with, we need to raise taxes in a fairer and more
predictable way. I do not like the
endless fees and the over complicated measures authorizing parcel taxes. We could drop the parcel taxes and reform our
business taxes, sales taxes and service fees in a way that cover’s our real
costs. I am open to all of it as long as
it is fair, keeps residents in their homes and lets local business, especially
small business, survive securely. In a
separate posting, I will stick my neck out and propose a different business
tax. My basic principal is that people
making money should pay taxes accordingly and people who are not making money
here should have some kind of security.
Measures Y, Q and others like them need to be brought back
into the fold as part of basic way we do business. I believe in the dedicated funding
commitments to community policing and our libraries, but not by this
process. A guaranteed percentage of
general fund spending would probably be better.
A non-rider rule would also help so that such things as community
policing would not be stuck paying 4 million dollars to the fire department
(this is the current Measure Y).
I have no idea why we do not spend our money AFTER we raise
it. What if we spent in 2012 based on
what we took in during 2011 instead of what we hope to take in during
2013? Somehow I fear that I am in danger
of being taken to the border and expelled from the United States for saying
such a thing, but it would make planning a “hecka” easier.
And how about the business cycle? It happens.
Capitalism is the system we live under in this country. We have been having big downturns on a
regular basis since well before the panic of 1893 and they should not be a
cause for us to be unprepared or panic in 2012.
I make some jokes during forums that it is sad that the Green Party, the
one party that puts people before profit, is the one brining up this very basic
fact about our economy. It is sad and a
bit odd. The “rainy day fund” that some
discuss and a few have implemented can be the way we do this. The definition of the growth/recession can be
fixed to performance markers and the transition from good times to bad times,
and the release of “rainy day” funds can be set by a pre determined formula at
the beginning of each spending year.
During periods of
high growth and heavier investment and more real-estate transactions is when we
should NOT spend on upgrading our buildings, purchasing new resources, special
public works or big projects. During
those times we should restrict government to basic services. We can learn from recent history and never
ever allow any of the real-estate transfer taxes to anything but the rainy day
fund. In good times, we should keep our
libraries, parks, civic centers, programs running, pay our debts, and put
sidewalk expansion, paving roads, development projects and such on hold.
And we should spend when times are bad. That is when those public projects will cost
the least to do and when an injection of shorter term public jobs would do the
most good. It is also when it is least
expensive to borrow money.
I see it as an economic shock absorber. Sort of a rainy day fund with a works project
administration ready to start up on those rainy days.
Now we can, and I will, work on these points one by one and
see what kind of improvements we can get piece by piece. That is the way we work on such issues now
and the result is usually incomplete reforms that do not accomplish much but
make day to day government even more complicated and paralyzed.
So I will also advocate that Budget Convention to give us a
chance to work on a new budget and new budget process taking the big picture
into account.
The alternative is to continue the current budget and budget
process with our next budget crisis on schedule for 2013.
Or?
Are there some other proposals?
Don
